Sisyphus Shrugged - meerow.
Lasciate ogni speranza and put your feet up.
jmhm
[info]jmhm
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
meerow.
Republican federal corruption OG Al D'Amato sticks his oar in on behalf of the Democrat
Alfonse M. D'Amato, the former senator, sharply criticized a leading Republican candidate for governor, William F. Weld, saying last night that Mr. Weld was under the "cloud" of a federal investigation for once running a "sham college."

Mr. D'Amato, a Republican, also chastised Mr. Weld for resigning as governor of Massachusetts in 1997, before his second term was over, and then seeking to lead New York "without any real experience here."

...

Mr. D'Amato also said that Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for governor, had done an "excellent" job in office.

This is remarkably interesting for what it says about the current state of New York Republican politics.

a brief digression about Mr. Pataki, Mr. D'Amato and local politics, recent and not-so-recent, here in New York

Mr. D'Amato was, for many years, the autocrat of the New York Republican party, and he pretty much invented our departing Republican governor (mostly to piss Rudy Giuliani off - New York Republicans don't much like Mr. Giuliani, but Mr. D'Amato likes him less than most). Unfortunately for the former Senator, Mr. Pataki isn't doing all that well, and the rest of his current political stable is - shall we say - not quite ready for prime time.

Mr. Pataki (like NYC Mayor Mr. Bloomberg) cut a sweetheart deal with a politically well-placed union to get their endorsement in his re-election campaign. This hurt him badly with the national Republicans he's desperately courting for a federal appointment (he's pretty much played out here in New York).*

In this, parenthetically, he differs from Mr. Bloomberg, a billionaire who is in it for the good the Republican party can do his media empire through judicious deregulation. There are those cynical souls who think that his single-minded focus on the good of media company stockholders might have had something to do with the universal press support he got at election time for his less-than-universally-appreciated performance in office, but I digress.

Back to the strike: Like Mr. Bloomberg, Mr. Pataki saw an opportunity to get himself back in the good graces of fiscal hawks by cracking down on the transit union. With his usual deft political touch, he saw this opportunity after Bloomberg, badly bloodied in the court of public opinion, caved, declared victory and went home.

Part of Mr. Bloomberg's cave-in was a deal to give the transit workers a refund of pension contributions they had made prior to an earlier contract which lowered the percentage of their pension contributions. This is particularly humiliating for Mr. Bloomberg, since the givebacks will more than cover any Taylor Law fines (two days' pay for every day out on strike-public employees are barred by law from striking in New York) that were levied against unionmembers during the course of the strike, but of course Mr. Bloomberg doesn't much care how much of the MTA's money he spends to make his little problems go away (you'd want to keep in mind that Mr. Bloomberg might only control four out of the nine MTA board, but Mr. Pataki needs Republican friends with money very badly right now).

This left the field wide-open for Mr. Pataki, who is currently playing to the balcony by attempting to retroactively derail the contract agreement. Says the MTA board (which kept him apprised of the negotiations) never told him about the giveback (they say they did). Now he wants to unilaterally change the MTA's agreement with the union to remove the givebacks, which would most likely send the union back out on strike, as well as (and here's the beauty part) removing the "bargaining in good faith" component of the MTA's negotiations that trigger the Taylor Law.

Honestly, it's better than All My Children. You just have to find someplace other than the Times to read about most of it. I recommend Newsday.

end of brief digression about Mr. Pataki and local politics, recent and not-so-recent, here in New York

Back to Mr. D'Amato and Mr. Weld: it seems that the former Senator is still a bit testy about the former Governor leading the Justice Department investigation of the former Senator's brother for misusing the former Senator's office for private profit which ended in the conviction of the former Senator's brother (later overturned on appeal). This is one of the factors that led to the former Senator's defeat by Mr. Schumer, thus ending a staggering series of ethics violations and endless televised bootless trips to the fishing hole on Whitewater.

Amusingly, Mr. Weld's experience in Tennessee is controversial specifically because it involved, er, for-profit education, working-class students getting screwed and backdoor union-busting.

It's a shame. He sounds like Al's kinda guy.

xposted to Hullaballoo


*This has been a real boon to New York politics watchers who needed a good laugh, as the national party gifted us with Mrs. Pirro's short-lived Republican challenge to Hillary, which was the greatest thing since State Senator Espada and we all appreciated it
Comments
otherdeb From: [info]otherdeb Date: January 4th, 2006 05:21 pm (UTC) (linkie thing)
And what I really find to be ironic is that years ago, when D'Amato was first starting out, my mother and her friend, Etta, worked for his campaigns because they thought he would be the young, honest guy who would fight corruption.
From: (Anonymous) Date: January 4th, 2006 05:48 pm (UTC) (linkie thing)
The one thing I really regretted about the whole TWU strike was that they were subject to rules that fined them for going on strike. Now, you say, Pataki's egotistical interference in the negotiation may reverse those fines? Yay for bigfooting!
contrafrutexus From: [info]contrafrutexus Date: January 5th, 2006 08:02 pm (UTC) (linkie thing)

D'Amato corrupt?

It's certainly prejudiced on my part, but having grown up in Nassau County in the 'Sixties and 'Seventies, and been aware that the governments there were nearly universally corrupt, I just assumed that Mr. D'Amato came to the Senate thoroughly pre-greased. Darn Javits.
incendiarymind From: [info]incendiarymind Date: January 4th, 2006 07:46 pm (UTC) (linkie thing)
I'm getting a little worried about all of these Republicans endorsing Spitzer. Makes me wonder about Spitzer.
jmhm From: [info]jmhm Date: January 4th, 2006 07:55 pm (UTC) (linkie thing)
I don't see reason just yet - the Wall Street Journal editorial page has been slandering him doubletime lately.
tnh From: [info]tnh Date: January 5th, 2006 03:55 am (UTC) (linkie thing)
Lord, that's a lovely piece of political writing: deft, knowledgeable, and effortlessly compressed.

Well, it feels effortless. It's egoboo either way.
jmhm From: [info]jmhm Date: January 5th, 2006 05:00 am (UTC) (linkie thing)
I'm incredibly flattered that you think so.
ckd From: [info]ckd Date: January 6th, 2006 12:37 am (UTC) (linkie thing)
I think Weld did a not-too-bad job as governor here. Of course, there's an element of "by comparison to the alternatives" involved, since the alternatives included:

His 1990 opponent John "Herr Doktor" Silber, beloved of so many Boston University students for his views on the university's anti-discrimination policy, his promulgation of a restrictive policy against guests in dorms (ironically discriminating against heterosexual relationships), and other authoritatarian opinions and actions.

His Lieutenant Governor and successor, Paul Cellucci, who later did for our Canadian embassy what he did for Massachusetts, namely, not much of any effect.

Cellucci's Lt. Gov., Jane "never the real governor" Swift, best known for her helicopter rides and her husband's perjury on their wedding license application.

Now, of course, we have Mitt "couldn't have been elected in Utah, so ran in Massachusetts" Romney.

At least Weld has the distinction of having Jesse Helms as an enemy. One could do worse.
jmhm From: [info]jmhm Date: January 6th, 2006 01:37 am (UTC) (linkie thing)
Oh, I may have mentioned Ms. Swift once or twice.

She pissed me off so badly. No, you asshole, you are not representative of working women. The women in your office making a fraction of your salary *and* paying rent for their living quarters who had to shell out for extra hours of daycare so they could finish the work they couldn't get done while they were looking after your children for free are representative of working women, and they didn't get a helicopter home.

She pissed me off, did I mention?
ahhhs. -- hmmm?
profile
Sisyphus Shrugged
User: [info]jmhm
Name: Sisyphus Shrugged
links
tags